Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Wiley: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: Table of Contents
Gas‐Phase Formation of Grignard‐type Organolanthanide (III) Ions RLnCl3‐: the Influences of Lanthanide Center and Hydrocarbyl Group
Rationale
Compared with organomagnesium compounds (Grignard reagents), the Grignard-type organolanthanides (III) exhibit several utilizable differences in reactivity. However, the fundamental understanding of Grignard-type organolanthanides (III) is still in its infancy. Decarboxylation of metal carboxylate ions is a powerful method to obtain organometallic ions which are well suited for gas-phase investigation by using electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry in combination with density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Methods
The (RCO2)LnCl3– (R = CH3, Ln = La-Lu except Pm; Ln = La, R = CH3CH2, CH2CH, HCC, C6H5 and C6H11) precursor ions were produced in the gas phase via ESI of LnCl3 and RCO2H or RCO2Na mixtures in methanol. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) was employed to examine whether the Grignard-type organolanthanide (III) ions RLnCl3– can be obtained via decarboxylation of lanthanide chloride carboxylate ions (RCO2)LnCl3–. With the aid of DFT calculations, the influences of lanthanide center and hydrocarbyl group on the formation of RLnCl3– can be uncovered.
Results
When R = CH3, CID of (CH3CO2)LnCl3– (Ln = La-Lu except Pm) all gave decarboxylation products (CH3)LnCl3– and reduction products LnCl3·– with a variation in the relative intensity ratio of (CH3)LnCl3–/LnCl3·–. The trend is following as (CH3)EuCl3–/EuCl3·– < (CH3)YbCl3–/YbCl3·– ≈ (CH3)SmCl3–/SmCl3·– < other (CH3)LnCl3–/LnCl3·–, which complies with the trend of Ln (III)/Ln (II) reduction potentials in general. When Ln = La and hydrocarbyl groups were varied as CH3CH2, CH2CH, HCC, C6H5 and C6H11, the fragmentation behaviors of these (RCO2)LaCl3– precursor ions are diverse. Except for (C6H11CO2)LaCl3–, the four remaining (RCO2)LaCl3– (R = CH3CH2, CH2CH, HCC and C6H5) ions all underwent decarboxylation to give RLaCl3–. (CH2CH)LaCl3– and especially (CH3CH2)LaCl3– are prone to undergo β-hydride transfer to form LaHCl3–, while (HCC)LaCl3– and (C6H5)LaCl3– not. Minor reduction product, LaCl3·–, was formed via C6H5 radical loss of (C6H5)LaCl3–. The relative intensities of RLaCl3– compared to (RCO2)LaCl3– decrease as follow: HCC > CH2CH > C6H5 > CH3 > CH3CH2 >> C6H11 (not visible).
Conclusion
A series of Grignard-type organolanthanide (III) ions RLnCl3– (R = CH3, Ln = La-Lu except Pm; Ln = La, R = CH3CH2, CH2CH, HCC and C6H5) were generated from (RCO2)LnCl3– via CO2 loss while (C6H11)LaCl3– not. The experimental and theoretical results suggest that the reduction potentials of Ln (III)/Ln (II) couples as well as the bulkiness and hybridization of hydrocarbyl groups play crucial roles in promoting or limiting the formation of RLnCl3– via decarboxylation of (RCO2)LnCl3–.
Meixian Yang,
Zhixin Xiong,
Yangjuan Li,
Xiuting Chen,
Wei Zhou
March 28, 2023
https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9512?af=R