Talk:Molecular ion: Difference between revisions

From Mass Spec Terms
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Marcos N. Eberlin????????ɬ????ɂİ??
Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?*****
02-26-2004 02:01 PM ET (US)
02-26-2004 02:01 PM ET (US)


Line 6: Line 6:
----
----


Marcos N. Eberlin????????ɬ????ɂİ??
Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?*****
02-26-2004 01:57 PM ET (US)
02-26-2004 01:57 PM ET (US)


Line 20: Line 20:
----
----


Jean-Fran??????ɬ????ɂİ????ois GAL????????ɬ????ɂİ??
Jean-Fran?***?*?**??****?*??***?*?**?**?*??ois GAL?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?*****
03-06-2004 10:19 AM ET (US)
03-06-2004 10:19 AM ET (US)


I agree with Marcos Eberlin comments.
I agree with Marcos Eberlin comments.

Latest revision as of 11:54, 11 March 2024

Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 02-26-2004 02:01 PM ET (US)

By far the best definition! [- the IUPAC definition - the] ASMS definition should be revised.


Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 02-26-2004 01:57 PM ET (US)

[re the ASMS poster definition] The term molecular ion should be reserved to ions formed by addition or removal of an electron from the intact, neutral molecule: M+. or M-.

MH+ is the protonated molecule [M - H]- is the deprotonated molecule. [M + Na]+ is the Na+ adduct and so on...

Otherwise, it is a chaos since who is going to define the size limits for the "small units" Otherwise people will continue to use obnoxious terms such as "protonated molecular ion"


Jean-Fran?***?*?**??****?*??***?*?**?**?*??ois GAL?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 03-06-2004 10:19 AM ET (US)

I agree with Marcos Eberlin comments.