Talk:Mass/charge Ratio: Difference between revisions

From Mass Spec Terms
(m/z is wrong)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
let's get rid of the ''m/z''. It is conceptually wrong.
let's get rid of the ''m/z''. It is conceptually wrong.
I made a new proposal.
I made a new proposal.
----
I moved the [[Suggested Definition]] from the front page and used the new template:
{{Sugdef|m/z|The mass/charge ratio is a physical property that is measured by [[Mass Spectrometer | mass spectrometers]].
The symbol for the physical quantity mass/charge is ''m/q''. The former ''[[m/z]]'' is based on a missconception and should no longer be used.
The SI unit of the physical quantity ''m/q'' is kilogram/coulomb ('''kg/C''').
In [[Mass Spectrometry | mass spectrometry]] it is more common to use the [[Atomic Mass Unit]] '''u''' and the [http://www.iupac.org/goldbook/A00504.pdf atomic unit] for charge '''e''' which is equal to the [http://www.iupac.org/goldbook/E02032.pdf elementary charge].
This means the unit for mass/charge is:
: [''m/q''] = '''u'''/'''e'''
'''u''' is sometimes called [[Dalton]] ('''Da'''). '''u'''/'''e''' is sometimes called [[Thomson]] ('''Th'''). Hence, a [[Mass Spectrum | mass spectrum]] x-axis should be labeled as either of the below:
* ''m/q''  ('''u'''/'''e''')
* ''m/q''  ('''Da'''/'''e''')
* ''m/q''  ('''Th''')}}
(Note that this isn't my def, just my edit to put it on the Discussion page - KKM)
: -- [[User:Kkmurray|K. Murray]] 15:03, 13 Jan 2005 (CST)

Revision as of 17:03, 13 January 2005