Talk:Molecular ion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Marcos N. Eberlin? | Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** | ||
02-26-2004 02:01 PM ET (US) | 02-26-2004 02:01 PM ET (US) | ||
By far the best definition! [- the IUPAC definition - the] ASMS definition should be revised. | By far the best definition! [- the IUPAC definition - the] [[ASMS Terms and Definitions Poster|ASMS definition]] should be revised. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Marcos N. Eberlin? | Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** | ||
02-26-2004 01:57 PM ET (US) | 02-26-2004 01:57 PM ET (US) | ||
[re the ASMS poster definition] The term molecular ion should be reserved to ions formed by addition or removal of an electron from the intact, neutral molecule: M+. or M-. | [re the ASMS poster definition] The term molecular ion should be reserved to ions formed by addition or removal of an electron from the intact, neutral molecule: M<sup>+.</sup> or M<sup>-.</sup> | ||
MH+ is the protonated molecule | MH<sup>+</sup> is the [[protonated molecule]] | ||
[M - H]- is the deprotonated molecule. | [M - H]<sup>-</sup> is the [[deprotonated molecule]]. | ||
[M + Na]+ is the Na+ adduct and so on... | [M + Na]<sup>+</sup> is the Na<sup>+</sup> adduct and so on... | ||
Otherwise, it is a chaos since who is going to define the size limits for the "small units" | Otherwise, it is a chaos since who is going to define the size limits for the "small units" | ||
Otherwise people will continue to use obnoxious terms such as "protonated molecular ion" | Otherwise people will continue to use obnoxious terms such as "[[protonated molecular ion]]" | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Jean-Fran? | Jean-Fran?***?*?**??****?*??***?*?**?**?*??ois GAL?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** | ||
03-06-2004 10:19 AM ET (US) | 03-06-2004 10:19 AM ET (US) | ||
I agree with Marcos Eberlin comments. | I agree with Marcos Eberlin comments. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 11 March 2024
Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 02-26-2004 02:01 PM ET (US)
By far the best definition! [- the IUPAC definition - the] ASMS definition should be revised.
Marcos N. Eberlin?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 02-26-2004 01:57 PM ET (US)
[re the ASMS poster definition] The term molecular ion should be reserved to ions formed by addition or removal of an electron from the intact, neutral molecule: M+. or M-.
MH+ is the protonated molecule [M - H]- is the deprotonated molecule. [M + Na]+ is the Na+ adduct and so on...
Otherwise, it is a chaos since who is going to define the size limits for the "small units" Otherwise people will continue to use obnoxious terms such as "protonated molecular ion"
Jean-Fran?***?*?**??****?*??***?*?**?**?*??ois GAL?***?*?**??***?*?***?*??***?*?**?**?***** 03-06-2004 10:19 AM ET (US)
I agree with Marcos Eberlin comments.
